ZEN FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF QUANTUM MECHANICS -- 7

THE NATURE OF THE POSSIBLE. WHAT QUANTUM MECHANICS CAN GAIN FROM ZEN?

So, we've found that the goal of correct Zen practice is to become unentangled, like a wave function, because in this state, you're free from your past (your karma), you have a choice (free will), and you have an anticipation of the future (intuition), which in particular gives you an insight into what you should do in the long run to maintain this state of mind. In other words, this is a way of realising your potential or, as some call it, your true self. Indeed, as it's known, to realise your true self, you don't need to invent anything: it already exists, and all you should do is just eliminate the roadblocks.

In other words, I'm sure Possibles are real in a sense they don't exist simply in our minds. And although I said that only unentangled individuals can fully enjoy the benefits of being truly independent, just as entangled particles can retain some of their wave functions' properties, we can still think in terms of Possibles even when considering partially entangled entities like organisations, companies, or groups of people bound by common goals and beliefs.

Consider Google and Apple in their early stages: surely they had a lot of very lucrative offers to merge with bigger companies. Were Google and Apple being irrational in turning them down? Everyone can see what they would've lost in the long run.

In this post, I'm going to explore the NATURE of the Possible, and I'll start doing this (since no-one's invented anything better) in a very subjective way: by exploiting how we can FEEL it. Since our individual potentials/true selves are part of it, this should be quite a valid approach. And then, I'll look into what our findings could actually imply.

So, how can one feel their true self? IF ONE'S DOING ZAZEN CORRECTLY, they feel it as denial, or negation. I don't know what this means in terms of physics, but I suspect this is where quantum mechanics can gain insight from Zen.

THE MAIN PROBLEM

Remember, I started this series of posts* -- Zen from the Perspective of Quantum Mechanics -- so you could better understand what correct Zen practice should be, because there are at least two different ways of performing zazen among Zen practitioners. Sometimes you can trace this division as the difference between Rinzai and Soto Zen. As a result, they achieve two different states of mind, but no one seems to care, but for me, this is the most crucial question Zen must answer today.

In a nutshell, if you, for example, compare how Katsuki Sekida describes zazen in his Zen Training with how most Zen practitioners do it, you'll find two different techniques.

Here's how Katsuki Sekida describes it:
'However, if you really attain this state you will find it to be a remarkable thing. At the extremity of having denied all and having nothing left to deny, we reach a state in which absolute silence and stillness reign, bathed in a pure, serene light' (Ch.1).

Moreover, according to him, this denial (or tension in the tanden as one perceives it) is the source of mental power which allows us to control wandering thoughts (Ch.3). As you can see, even the technique of stopping thoughts differs from what the majority of Zen and mindfulness practitioners use. For them, there's no trace of denial in their zazen practice; it's more about merging with everything. Here's how Shunryu Suzuki describes it in his Zen Mind, Beginner's Mind: 'We say "inner world" or "outer world," but actually there is just one whole world. In this limitless world, our throat is like a swinging door. The air comes in and goes out like someone passing through a swinging door.' (PART I: RIGH T PRACTICE: Breathing 29)

I'll delve into this more in future posts; for now, let's summarise.

On the one hand, we have absolute denial, which means getting unentangled with the environment. With practice, this approach gives you the UNDERSTANDING of what's going on, the situation, which for some may look like a real mystery. So we can say that denial is the correct way of perceiving reality. In this case, everything falls into place: denial is just another term for detachment, or non-attachment, creating no gap between your sitting zazen practice and everyday life, which becomes just a natural extension of the former.

On the other hand, as the majority of Zen and mindfulness practitioners perform zazen, we actually have merging with everything. I suspect that at the core of this sort of practice is the wrong idea of non-duality; while the real experience of non-duality is the result of absolute denial pushed to its limit, not merging. Consequently, there's a loose connection between their zazen practice and what they experience in their everyday lives, especially if they usually do something that engages mainly the rational left hemisphere. They often come out with wisdom like 'we're all interconnected,' which isn't a great deal to spot and experience. For me, to realise that you're free -- and how this can be possible! -- is much more of an achievement.

In other words, we can identify two sorts of energies: denial (negation) and merging. Keep in mind, denial isn't aggression but something opposite to merging: it's the force that nudges us to break free and set boundaries.

HIERARCHY

Say you run your own business, then decide it's more lucrative to work for a company you previously competed against. How do your relationships with former rivals, now colleagues, change? A team inside a company generally works as one unit, not as competitors -- at least that's how it's presumed to be. Indeed, your relationships change in some real sense, and I'm sure it can even be described by Game Theory. You're not supposed to deny them anymore; it's a form of merging.

Since an individual is a more complex entity than a particle, entanglement for you may mean something more complex. For example, there may be different rules for different players -- some may be allowed to deny, while others aren't -- that's how hierarchies emerge. Hierarchies can be seen as merging on unequal terms, where some use the energy, i.e, potentials, of others. You should know what you lose when you start working on someone else: they use your potential for their own project. The good news is that you don't even need to invent your own one: simply trying to remain unentangled can be your personal project.

Then one might ask: is being unentangled a greater achievement than being at the top of a hierarchy? The answer is yes, because only when unentangled can you act as your true self requires and fully realise your potential. One might also wonder if such individuals are destined to remain alone forever. The answer is no. They can unite on an equal, non-hierarchical basis. Relationships based on denial -- have you ever heard of a civilisation like this?